<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1716 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464305</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT held that s.144C is a self-contained code and final assessment passed under s.144C(13) in conformity with DRP directions cannot be revisited under s.263. DRP, empowered by s.144C, issues binding directions to the AO and the AO must pass the final order without further hearing; the PCIT has no authority to assume revisionary jurisdiction under s.263 over such final assessments. Decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 13:33:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1716 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464305</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT held that s.144C is a self-contained code and final assessment passed under s.144C(13) in conformity with DRP directions cannot be revisited under s.263. DRP, empowered by s.144C, issues binding directions to the AO and the AO must pass the final order without further hearing; the PCIT has no authority to assume revisionary jurisdiction under s.263 over such final assessments. Decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>