<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 114 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47395</link>
    <description>Printed bed sheets, bed covers and pillow cases were treated as ineligible for exemption under Notification No. 65/87-C.E. because the relevant test is whether power was used at any integral stage of the continuous manufacturing process of the final made-up textile article. A segmented stage-by-stage approach was rejected, and screen printing, colouring and related operations were regarded as essential to production. The challenge to penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act also failed because the point had not been raised earlier and the adjudication occurred after that provision came into force. The appeal was therefore unsuccessful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 114 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47395</link>
      <description>Printed bed sheets, bed covers and pillow cases were treated as ineligible for exemption under Notification No. 65/87-C.E. because the relevant test is whether power was used at any integral stage of the continuous manufacturing process of the final made-up textile article. A segmented stage-by-stage approach was rejected, and screen printing, colouring and related operations were regarded as essential to production. The challenge to penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act also failed because the point had not been raised earlier and the adjudication occurred after that provision came into force. The appeal was therefore unsuccessful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>