<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 810 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780014</link>
    <description>Where an appeal arose from the same common tribunal order and involved an identical substantive controversy already decided in a connected matter, no fresh independent adjudication on merits was required. The earlier decision was treated as governing the present appeal, and the impugned order was examined on that basis. Applying the prior ruling on the same issue, the HC allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 810 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780014</link>
      <description>Where an appeal arose from the same common tribunal order and involved an identical substantive controversy already decided in a connected matter, no fresh independent adjudication on merits was required. The earlier decision was treated as governing the present appeal, and the impugned order was examined on that basis. Applying the prior ruling on the same issue, the HC allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>