<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 816 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780020</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chandigarh - AT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding that the demand for service tax under the reverse charge mechanism was unsupported. The tribunal found no allegation or evidence that the appellant accessed the foreign providers&#039; websites and noted payments were made through conventional banking channels, undermining the demand which rested on assumption. As the tax, if payable, would be revenue neutral due to available Cenvat credit on RCM payments, neither tax nor penalty was sustainable. The tribunal further held that the extended-period demand could not be sustained, leading to dismissal of the normal-period demand as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:08:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 816 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780020</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chandigarh - AT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding that the demand for service tax under the reverse charge mechanism was unsupported. The tribunal found no allegation or evidence that the appellant accessed the foreign providers&#039; websites and noted payments were made through conventional banking channels, undermining the demand which rested on assumption. As the tax, if payable, would be revenue neutral due to available Cenvat credit on RCM payments, neither tax nor penalty was sustainable. The tribunal further held that the extended-period demand could not be sustained, leading to dismissal of the normal-period demand as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>