https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780022 NCLAT dismissed the company appeal and confirmed the impugned order upholding the resolution plan. The Tribunal held that treating a contingent claim as an ordinary claim and the Resolution Professional's classification were permissible, and the plan's 24-month cap for creditors to crystallize claims was valid. The decision follows and is constrained by the Principal Bench's prior rulings on similar consolidated appeals, leaving no substantive issue for separate determination in this appeal. en-us Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:08:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780022 NCLAT dismissed the company appeal and confirmed the impugned order upholding the resolution plan. The Tribunal held that treating a contingent claim as an ordinary claim and the Resolution Professional's classification were permissible, and the plan's 24-month cap for creditors to crystallize claims was valid. The decision follows and is constrained by the Principal Bench's prior rulings on similar consolidated appeals, leaving no substantive issue for separate determination in this appeal. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780022