<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 839 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780043</link>
    <description>ITAT HYDERABAD - AT held that validity of assessment under s.153 remains open pending SC determination and directed AO to follow the SC&#039;s eventual ruling. Deduction under s.80IA was remanded to AO for factual verification regarding whether projects commenced development or O&amp;M on/after 1 Apr 2017, in view of the second proviso. On TP adjustments, Tribunal found the AE&#039;s receipt from Government to be a comparable uncontrolled price passed through to the appellant, so the assessee&#039;s CUP benchmarking was valid; TPO&#039;s rejection and adoption of &quot;another method&quot; to reallocate costs between eligible and non-eligible units exceeded TP scope. TP addition deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:08:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 839 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780043</link>
      <description>ITAT HYDERABAD - AT held that validity of assessment under s.153 remains open pending SC determination and directed AO to follow the SC&#039;s eventual ruling. Deduction under s.80IA was remanded to AO for factual verification regarding whether projects commenced development or O&amp;M on/after 1 Apr 2017, in view of the second proviso. On TP adjustments, Tribunal found the AE&#039;s receipt from Government to be a comparable uncontrolled price passed through to the appellant, so the assessee&#039;s CUP benchmarking was valid; TPO&#039;s rejection and adoption of &quot;another method&quot; to reallocate costs between eligible and non-eligible units exceeded TP scope. TP addition deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>