<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 848 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780052</link>
    <description>ITAT held the reopening notice under section 148 was time-barred as it was issued after the three-year limitation period and consequently the assessment framed under sections 147 read with 144 and 144B was invalid. The tribunal quashed the notice and assessment as void ab initio, allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, and relied on precedent emphasizing that reopening requires material within the statutory period to justify issuing notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:08:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 848 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780052</link>
      <description>ITAT held the reopening notice under section 148 was time-barred as it was issued after the three-year limitation period and consequently the assessment framed under sections 147 read with 144 and 144B was invalid. The tribunal quashed the notice and assessment as void ab initio, allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, and relied on precedent emphasizing that reopening requires material within the statutory period to justify issuing notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>