<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 863 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780067</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petitions for two reasons: the applications for condonation of a 256-day delay were rejected as the explanations were inadequate, and the petitions were also dismissed on merits by applying this Court&#039;s prior decision in a similar matter. The relief sought regarding whether interconnect service charges constituted royalty was therefore denied and the petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:08:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 863 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780067</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petitions for two reasons: the applications for condonation of a 256-day delay were rejected as the explanations were inadequate, and the petitions were also dismissed on merits by applying this Court&#039;s prior decision in a similar matter. The relief sought regarding whether interconnect service charges constituted royalty was therefore denied and the petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>