<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 865 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780069</link>
    <description>An order demanding tax on royalty paid to the Government was challenged under the CGST Act while a connected issue was pending before the Supreme Court. The HC found it appropriate to interfere at that stage, set aside the impugned order, and restored the proceeding for fresh adjudication after hearing the petitioner. The adjudicating authority was therefore required to reconsider the matter and pass a fresh order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:08:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 865 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780069</link>
      <description>An order demanding tax on royalty paid to the Government was challenged under the CGST Act while a connected issue was pending before the Supreme Court. The HC found it appropriate to interfere at that stage, set aside the impugned order, and restored the proceeding for fresh adjudication after hearing the petitioner. The adjudicating authority was therefore required to reconsider the matter and pass a fresh order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>