<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 866 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780070</link>
    <description>HC held the petitioners&#039; activity is a composite supply with the predominant element being printing services (photographic/videographic processing) rather than transfer of goods; tax liability is determined by the principal supply (service). Proceedings against the petitioners were upheld, the petition dismissed, and the petitioners may pursue available statutory remedies for any grievance concerning tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:08:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=859050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 866 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780070</link>
      <description>HC held the petitioners&#039; activity is a composite supply with the predominant element being printing services (photographic/videographic processing) rather than transfer of goods; tax liability is determined by the principal supply (service). Proceedings against the petitioners were upheld, the petition dismissed, and the petitioners may pursue available statutory remedies for any grievance concerning tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>