https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780073 The HC dismissed the second petition as not maintainable, holding the relief sought (release/provision of seized originals and leave to file detailed reply) had already been granted by the SC and no fresh cause of action was shown. The court found the claim that statutory documents must be returned to petitioner baseless, noted the respondents relied on 11 witnesses whose evidence had been produced and cross-examined, and deemed the petition mala fide and intended to stall adjudication. Petition dismissed with costs of Rs. 2,00,000 payable to respondent within four weeks. en-us Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:08:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780073 The HC dismissed the second petition as not maintainable, holding the relief sought (release/provision of seized originals and leave to file detailed reply) had already been granted by the SC and no fresh cause of action was shown. The court found the claim that statutory documents must be returned to petitioner baseless, noted the respondents relied on 11 witnesses whose evidence had been produced and cross-examined, and deemed the petition mala fide and intended to stall adjudication. Petition dismissed with costs of Rs. 2,00,000 payable to respondent within four weeks. Case-Laws GST Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780073