https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464293 Selection of Shiksha Karmis was not shown to be vitiated by bias where the committee was statutorily constituted, recusal safeguards were built in, and no factual basis established participation by related members in marking. However, ex parte cancellation of the appointments was unsustainable because the affected selectees were denied notice and an opportunity to show cause, amounting to a total breach of audi alteram partem for which separate proof of prejudice was unnecessary. The later revisional hearing did not cure the original denial of hearing, since revision could not substitute for the statutorily required first opportunity to be heard. en-us Wed, 29 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Oct 2025 14:22:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464293 Selection of Shiksha Karmis was not shown to be vitiated by bias where the committee was statutorily constituted, recusal safeguards were built in, and no factual basis established participation by related members in marking. However, ex parte cancellation of the appointments was unsustainable because the affected selectees were denied notice and an opportunity to show cause, amounting to a total breach of audi alteram partem for which separate proof of prejudice was unnecessary. The later revisional hearing did not cure the original denial of hearing, since revision could not substitute for the statutorily required first opportunity to be heard. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464293