<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47381</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Customs authorities were liable to pay demurrage charges until February 18, 2004, due to their negligence in allowing re-shipment. The writ petitioner was responsible for demurrage charges from February 18, 2004, onwards. The Court authorized the Port authority to sell the goods if not cleared within one month, using the proceeds to cover the charges and returning any surplus to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47381</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Customs authorities were liable to pay demurrage charges until February 18, 2004, due to their negligence in allowing re-shipment. The writ petitioner was responsible for demurrage charges from February 18, 2004, onwards. The Court authorized the Port authority to sell the goods if not cleared within one month, using the proceeds to cover the charges and returning any surplus to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>