<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47379</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the CESTAT order and directed a fresh hearing on the restoration application, emphasizing compliance with procedural rules and principles of natural justice. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper notice and opportunity for hearing, citing a legal precedent to uphold justice and rectify any mistake apparent from the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:58:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47379</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the CESTAT order and directed a fresh hearing on the restoration application, emphasizing compliance with procedural rules and principles of natural justice. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper notice and opportunity for hearing, citing a legal precedent to uphold justice and rectify any mistake apparent from the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>