https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464289 SC held that, on the facts, the participation of a Commission member related to a candidate who had abstained from that candidate's interview did not establish a reasonable likelihood of bias vitiating other selections; only the one selection previously quashed remained affected. The HC's order directing a selective re-interview of a specific successful candidate with previously unsuccessful candidates was unjustified and was set aside as inequitable and impracticable. The change of post-preference shown to have been communicated to and accepted by the Commission before declaration was held valid, so challenges based on alleged later change failed. en-us Thu, 14 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Oct 2025 13:18:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464289 SC held that, on the facts, the participation of a Commission member related to a candidate who had abstained from that candidate's interview did not establish a reasonable likelihood of bias vitiating other selections; only the one selection previously quashed remained affected. The HC's order directing a selective re-interview of a specific successful candidate with previously unsuccessful candidates was unjustified and was set aside as inequitable and impracticable. The change of post-preference shown to have been communicated to and accepted by the Commission before declaration was held valid, so challenges based on alleged later change failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464289