<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 797 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780001</link>
    <description>AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s order dropping proceedings. The directorate failed to prove, on the preponderance of probabilities, unlawful maintenance of a foreign bank account under FEMA/Regulation, relying primarily on I-T statements without independent corroboration. The contested foreign-origin document lacked authentication, signatures or originals, and the directorate could not clarify its provenance; relevant file was later reported untraceable following a fire at its zonal office. Given these evidentiary deficiencies and failure to exercise independent investigative powers under FEMA, allegations were not established and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:31:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 797 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780001</link>
      <description>AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s order dropping proceedings. The directorate failed to prove, on the preponderance of probabilities, unlawful maintenance of a foreign bank account under FEMA/Regulation, relying primarily on I-T statements without independent corroboration. The contested foreign-origin document lacked authentication, signatures or originals, and the directorate could not clarify its provenance; relevant file was later reported untraceable following a fire at its zonal office. Given these evidentiary deficiencies and failure to exercise independent investigative powers under FEMA, allegations were not established and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=780001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>