https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93405 The HC dismissed the writ petition, holding that disclosure requests implicating third-party information require mandatory compliance with Section 11 of the RTI Act and that Sections 8 and 11 must be read conjunctively; information prima facie constituting personal or confidential third-party data attracts the protections of Section 8(1)(j) unless the proviso (demonstrable larger public interest) is satisfied. The court further found Section 158(1) of the GST Act does not automatically preclude RTI disclosure but, on the facts, the Petitioner failed to establish prima facie large-scale fraud or sufficient public interest to override confidentiality, so GST returns were rightly withheld and the petition was dismissed. en-us Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:14 +0530 Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93405 The HC dismissed the writ petition, holding that disclosure requests implicating third-party information require mandatory compliance with Section 11 of the RTI Act and that Sections 8 and 11 must be read conjunctively; information prima facie constituting personal or confidential third-party data attracts the protections of Section 8(1)(j) unless the proviso (demonstrable larger public interest) is satisfied. The court further found Section 158(1) of the GST Act does not automatically preclude RTI disclosure but, on the facts, the Petitioner failed to establish prima facie large-scale fraud or sufficient public interest to override confidentiality, so GST returns were rightly withheld and the petition was dismissed. Highlights GST Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:14 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93405