<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47363</link>
    <description>The second petition on the same subject was deemed not maintainable by the Court following the disposal of the first petition. Even if considered maintainable, the second petition lacked substance and was required to be dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit order. The Appellate Tribunal had ordered a pre-deposit of Rs. 3 Crores, which was not complied with by the petitioners. The subsequent Miscellaneous Civil Application was rejected for failing to present new grounds justifying modification. Due to the petitioner&#039;s inability to comply with the pre-deposit order, the petition was ultimately dismissed by the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47363</link>
      <description>The second petition on the same subject was deemed not maintainable by the Court following the disposal of the first petition. Even if considered maintainable, the second petition lacked substance and was required to be dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit order. The Appellate Tribunal had ordered a pre-deposit of Rs. 3 Crores, which was not complied with by the petitioners. The subsequent Miscellaneous Civil Application was rejected for failing to present new grounds justifying modification. Due to the petitioner&#039;s inability to comply with the pre-deposit order, the petition was ultimately dismissed by the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>