https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779949 An order pronounced after an undisputed inordinate delay was treated as vitiated for breach of natural justice, so the HC quashed it without examining the substantive appeal grounds and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. The Court also held that the alternate remedy objection did not bar writ interference where the impugned order was flawed on account of delayed pronouncement and resulting procedural unfairness. The dispute was therefore sent back for reconsideration by the Tribunal after hearing all points raised in the appeal. en-us Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779949 An order pronounced after an undisputed inordinate delay was treated as vitiated for breach of natural justice, so the HC quashed it without examining the substantive appeal grounds and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. The Court also held that the alternate remedy objection did not bar writ interference where the impugned order was flawed on account of delayed pronouncement and resulting procedural unfairness. The dispute was therefore sent back for reconsideration by the Tribunal after hearing all points raised in the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 06 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779949