<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 754 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779958</link>
    <description>ITAT (Del) held reassessment under s.147 invalid because approval under s.151(2) was granted by Commissioner instead of the prescribed JCIT, contravening statutory scheme. Relying on precedent that superior officers cannot exercise powers delegated to a specific post, the tribunal concluded the reopening lacked competent authorization and allowed the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 754 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779958</link>
      <description>ITAT (Del) held reassessment under s.147 invalid because approval under s.151(2) was granted by Commissioner instead of the prescribed JCIT, contravening statutory scheme. Relying on precedent that superior officers cannot exercise powers delegated to a specific post, the tribunal concluded the reopening lacked competent authorization and allowed the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>