<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 758 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779962</link>
    <description>For section 153C proceedings, the six-year limitation block is computed from the date the seized material is handed over to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, as reflected in the satisfaction note. On that basis, assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15 fell outside the permissible window linked to the later block, so the assumption of jurisdiction was invalid. The consequential assessments were therefore unsustainable and were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 758 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779962</link>
      <description>For section 153C proceedings, the six-year limitation block is computed from the date the seized material is handed over to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, as reflected in the satisfaction note. On that basis, assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15 fell outside the permissible window linked to the later block, so the assumption of jurisdiction was invalid. The consequential assessments were therefore unsustainable and were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>