<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 106 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47359</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing and setting aside condition No. 5 in the letter that imposed liability to pay interest for re-exporting warehoused goods. Citing legal principles and precedents, the court emphasized that interest under Section 61(2) of the Customs Act is linked to duty payable, and in cases of re-export where no duty is levied, interest does not apply. The judgment made the rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:05:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 106 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47359</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing and setting aside condition No. 5 in the letter that imposed liability to pay interest for re-exporting warehoused goods. Citing legal principles and precedents, the court emphasized that interest under Section 61(2) of the Customs Act is linked to duty payable, and in cases of re-export where no duty is levied, interest does not apply. The judgment made the rule absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>