https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779980 HC affirmed the ITAT and dismissed the appeals, holding that orders of the CIT(A)-11 issued after 18.06.2018 were erroneous, illegal and without jurisdiction. DGIT (Investigation) Karnataka & Goa had supervisory/administrative jurisdiction over CIT(A)-11 and had requested explanation and a halt to further orders; nonetheless CIT(A)-11 decided numerous disparate appeals shortly thereafter. Given that history and the confirmed findings in earlier rounds, the HC found no error in the ITAT's setting aside of those CIT(A)-11 orders. en-us Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779980 HC affirmed the ITAT and dismissed the appeals, holding that orders of the CIT(A)-11 issued after 18.06.2018 were erroneous, illegal and without jurisdiction. DGIT (Investigation) Karnataka & Goa had supervisory/administrative jurisdiction over CIT(A)-11 and had requested explanation and a halt to further orders; nonetheless CIT(A)-11 decided numerous disparate appeals shortly thereafter. Given that history and the confirmed findings in earlier rounds, the HC found no error in the ITAT's setting aside of those CIT(A)-11 orders. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779980