<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 778 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779982</link>
    <description>The SC upheld a remand order directing the Assessing Officer to conduct limited factual verification and found no basis for High Court interference. The Court noted that the appeal was disposed of in line with an earlier judgment concerning the same assessee, and the remand was confined to factual verification rather than a broader reopening of the dispute. As a result, the challenge to the remand order failed and the limited remand remained operative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 778 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779982</link>
      <description>The SC upheld a remand order directing the Assessing Officer to conduct limited factual verification and found no basis for High Court interference. The Court noted that the appeal was disposed of in line with an earlier judgment concerning the same assessee, and the remand was confined to factual verification rather than a broader reopening of the dispute. As a result, the challenge to the remand order failed and the limited remand remained operative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>