<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 779 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779983</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s interference with the ITAT order, accepting that the ITAT order was liable to be set aside and that the orders of the Appellate Commissioner and the Assessing Officer should be restored. The separate request relating to the quantum of tax payable was not examined on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 779 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779983</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s interference with the ITAT order, accepting that the ITAT order was liable to be set aside and that the orders of the Appellate Commissioner and the Assessing Officer should be restored. The separate request relating to the quantum of tax payable was not examined on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>