https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779991 HC held that the SCN was effectively time-barred because the department knew the authorized email had changed from the earlier address to the new address in Feb 2022, yet the SCN was served on the old address on 27 Nov 2024 and only served on the authorized address on 18 Feb 2025. The impugned order was passed without considering major submissions and violated principles of natural justice. The petitioner established a strong prima facie case for stay; matter stood over for admission on 20 Nov 2025. en-us Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779991 HC held that the SCN was effectively time-barred because the department knew the authorized email had changed from the earlier address to the new address in Feb 2022, yet the SCN was served on the old address on 27 Nov 2024 and only served on the authorized address on 18 Feb 2025. The impugned order was passed without considering major submissions and violated principles of natural justice. The petitioner established a strong prima facie case for stay; matter stood over for admission on 20 Nov 2025. Case-Laws GST Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779991