https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779994 ORISSA HC declined to interfere with administrative action blocking input tax credit, holding that the statutory authority is seised of ongoing investigation into transactions with the named suppliers and factual adjudication lies with that authority. The court refused to make factual findings or direct unblocking of the electronic credit ledger, noting the ledger was blocked only insofar as certain claimed credits and that no prejudice to the petitioner during the DGGI investigation was shown. The writ petition was dismissed as misconceived and premature. en-us Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779994 ORISSA HC declined to interfere with administrative action blocking input tax credit, holding that the statutory authority is seised of ongoing investigation into transactions with the named suppliers and factual adjudication lies with that authority. The court refused to make factual findings or direct unblocking of the electronic credit ledger, noting the ledger was blocked only insofar as certain claimed credits and that no prejudice to the petitioner during the DGGI investigation was shown. The writ petition was dismissed as misconceived and premature. Case-Laws GST Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779994