https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=58971 Challenges target the constitutional validity of the Uniform Civil Code, 2025, alleging that its uniform rules on live-in relationships disregard community marital customs and create a legal disparity. The petitions highlight an age discrepancy-live-in minimum age 18 for both sexes versus different marriage ages-and object to a registrar-administered 15-day dissolution for live-in arrangements, arguing it contrasts with the longer judicial dissolution process for marriage that entails maintenance obligations and may incentivize live-in relationships. en-us Wed, 15 Oct 2025 23:46:03 +0530 Wed, 15 Oct 2025 23:46:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=58971 Challenges target the constitutional validity of the Uniform Civil Code, 2025, alleging that its uniform rules on live-in relationships disregard community marital customs and create a legal disparity. The petitions highlight an age discrepancy-live-in minimum age 18 for both sexes versus different marriage ages-and object to a registrar-administered 15-day dissolution for live-in arrangements, arguing it contrasts with the longer judicial dissolution process for marriage that entails maintenance obligations and may incentivize live-in relationships. News - Wed, 15 Oct 2025 23:46:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=58971