<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2067 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464264</link>
    <description>A challenge based on inordinate delay in passing the impugned order was linked to the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view in Kopertek Metals, but that view had been stayed by the SC in GMR Airport Infrastructure. Following the Supreme Court&#039;s direction that hearings on the subject may be deferred until an appropriate decision is taken, the Tribunal deferred hearing and remanded the matters to the registry for relisting after the SC decides GMR Airport Infrastructure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 20:49:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2067 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464264</link>
      <description>A challenge based on inordinate delay in passing the impugned order was linked to the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view in Kopertek Metals, but that view had been stayed by the SC in GMR Airport Infrastructure. Following the Supreme Court&#039;s direction that hearings on the subject may be deferred until an appropriate decision is taken, the Tribunal deferred hearing and remanded the matters to the registry for relisting after the SC decides GMR Airport Infrastructure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>