<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1551 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464280</link>
    <description>HC held the search and seizure under s.132 invalid because the satisfaction note authorising the warrant was not produced despite prior Tribunal and HC directions, warrant issuance lacked the requisite recorded reasons and could reflect mala fides or collateral purpose. The Court affirmed that authorities must satisfy the court about regularity and relevant grounds for belief; courts may examine existence and relevance of material underpinning that belief though not its sufficiency. In view of non-production, an adverse inference was drawn and the exercise of power liable to be struck down, warranting quashing of proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:48:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1551 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464280</link>
      <description>HC held the search and seizure under s.132 invalid because the satisfaction note authorising the warrant was not produced despite prior Tribunal and HC directions, warrant issuance lacked the requisite recorded reasons and could reflect mala fides or collateral purpose. The Court affirmed that authorities must satisfy the court about regularity and relevant grounds for belief; courts may examine existence and relevance of material underpinning that belief though not its sufficiency. In view of non-production, an adverse inference was drawn and the exercise of power liable to be struck down, warranting quashing of proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>