<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 962 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464284</link>
    <description>The petitioner sought immediate release of IGST and duty drawback, but the court did not grant the substantive relief at this stage. It directed the concerned authorities to decide the claim for release of IGST with interest and duty drawback in accordance with law within the stipulated time, and preserved liberty to challenge that decision thereafter. The matter was thus disposed of on a direction for expeditious administrative consideration rather than on merits of the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 20:49:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 962 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464284</link>
      <description>The petitioner sought immediate release of IGST and duty drawback, but the court did not grant the substantive relief at this stage. It directed the concerned authorities to decide the claim for release of IGST with interest and duty drawback in accordance with law within the stipulated time, and preserved liberty to challenge that decision thereafter. The matter was thus disposed of on a direction for expeditious administrative consideration rather than on merits of the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>