https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464261 A Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court is bound by a Full Bench decision of the same court and cannot decline to follow it by labelling it per incuriam, except in the limited sense recognised for precedent. The article also states that an order of a District Judge functioning as the Educational Appellate Tribunal under the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975, remains subject to revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. On that basis, the proper challenge is by civil revision rather than writ petition, where the tribunal acts under the statutory proviso. en-us Wed, 14 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Oct 2025 18:02:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464261 A Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court is bound by a Full Bench decision of the same court and cannot decline to follow it by labelling it per incuriam, except in the limited sense recognised for precedent. The article also states that an order of a District Judge functioning as the Educational Appellate Tribunal under the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975, remains subject to revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. On that basis, the proper challenge is by civil revision rather than writ petition, where the tribunal acts under the statutory proviso. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464261