https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464261 Stare decisis requires a Single Judge to follow a binding Full Bench decision of the same High Court and prevents treating that decision as per incuriam. Per incuriam is confined to limited circumstances involving oversight of binding law, but a lower-strength Bench cannot use that doctrine to disregard a larger Bench ruling. Orders of a District Judge acting as an Educational Appellate Tribunal under the relevant statutory proviso remain subject to revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The appropriate challenge is therefore a civil revision rather than a writ petition, and a writ petition may be converted into a civil revision petition. en-us Wed, 14 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Oct 2025 18:02:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464261 Stare decisis requires a Single Judge to follow a binding Full Bench decision of the same High Court and prevents treating that decision as per incuriam. Per incuriam is confined to limited circumstances involving oversight of binding law, but a lower-strength Bench cannot use that doctrine to disregard a larger Bench ruling. Orders of a District Judge acting as an Educational Appellate Tribunal under the relevant statutory proviso remain subject to revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The appropriate challenge is therefore a civil revision rather than a writ petition, and a writ petition may be converted into a civil revision petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464261