https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15242 The Court held that Article 136 discretionary jurisdiction should not be exercised where adequate statutory appellate remedies exist, construed Section 75(5) CGST as permitting a maximum of three adjournments without creating a right to all three, and ruled that supply of illegible documents, absent demonstrable prejudice, does not vitiate adjudication or breach natural justice. en-us Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:29:19 +0530 Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:29:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15242 The Court held that Article 136 discretionary jurisdiction should not be exercised where adequate statutory appellate remedies exist, construed Section 75(5) CGST as permitting a maximum of three adjournments without creating a right to all three, and ruled that supply of illegible documents, absent demonstrable prejudice, does not vitiate adjudication or breach natural justice. Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:29:19 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15242