https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779926 CESTAT upheld that the appellant rendered taxable services, in some instances collected service tax but failed to deposit it or disclose it in returns, and that invocation of the extended limitation period was justified; however, because copies of many bills cited in the SCN were not furnished to the appellant and certain receipts (including a Rs.1,000,000 loan) were non-taxable, the matter is remitted to the adjudicating authority. Directions: supply the remaining invoices to the appellant; verify and allow non-taxable receipts on evidence; re-compute the service tax demand and adjust amounts already deposited; and re-calculate interest and penalties. en-us Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:28:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779926 CESTAT upheld that the appellant rendered taxable services, in some instances collected service tax but failed to deposit it or disclose it in returns, and that invocation of the extended limitation period was justified; however, because copies of many bills cited in the SCN were not furnished to the appellant and certain receipts (including a Rs.1,000,000 loan) were non-taxable, the matter is remitted to the adjudicating authority. Directions: supply the remaining invoices to the appellant; verify and allow non-taxable receipts on evidence; re-compute the service tax demand and adjust amounts already deposited; and re-calculate interest and penalties. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779926