<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 692 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779896</link>
    <description>ITAT held that additions based on mark-to-market valuation of unsold securities, representing unrealized gains, cannot be taxed as capital gains or business income for the year and directed the AO to delete the addition. The tribunal observed corresponding profits and losses on outstanding scrips were offered in subsequent years and found the Section 115BBE implication to be merely consequential. Issue of TCS credit was remitted to the AO for fresh decision in accordance with law since lower authorities made no finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 692 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779896</link>
      <description>ITAT held that additions based on mark-to-market valuation of unsold securities, representing unrealized gains, cannot be taxed as capital gains or business income for the year and directed the AO to delete the addition. The tribunal observed corresponding profits and losses on outstanding scrips were offered in subsequent years and found the Section 115BBE implication to be merely consequential. Issue of TCS credit was remitted to the AO for fresh decision in accordance with law since lower authorities made no finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>