<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 700 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779904</link>
    <description>ITAT, Hyd. held that penalty under s.271B for failure to furnish audit report u/s.44AB was null and void because the firm did not exist in the relevant assessment year. Relying on a Coordinate Bench decision in the appellant&#039;s own case holding that assessment and penalty proceedings cannot be initiated where the firm was non-existent, the Tribunal quashed the penalty and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 700 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779904</link>
      <description>ITAT, Hyd. held that penalty under s.271B for failure to furnish audit report u/s.44AB was null and void because the firm did not exist in the relevant assessment year. Relying on a Coordinate Bench decision in the appellant&#039;s own case holding that assessment and penalty proceedings cannot be initiated where the firm was non-existent, the Tribunal quashed the penalty and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>