<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 707 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779911</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petition, holding that condonation of delay under s.119(2)(b) was warranted to prevent genuine hardship. After approval of a resolution plan, the new management discovered unaudited accounts and unfiled returns, promptly audited and filed them; GST registration had been cancelled for non-filing but later restored. Refusal to condone delay would have frustrated the binding resolution plan and defeated the company&#039;s right to seek carry-forward of past losses, so the impugned denial was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 707 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779911</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petition, holding that condonation of delay under s.119(2)(b) was warranted to prevent genuine hardship. After approval of a resolution plan, the new management discovered unaudited accounts and unfiled returns, promptly audited and filed them; GST registration had been cancelled for non-filing but later restored. Refusal to condone delay would have frustrated the binding resolution plan and defeated the company&#039;s right to seek carry-forward of past losses, so the impugned denial was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>