<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 715 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779919</link>
    <description>Petitioner arrested 12.4.2025 charged under Section 132 read with Section 69 of the CGST/State GST Act granted regular bail. Court observed pre-charge evidence is being recorded, witnesses are official, and there is no prima facie reason to believe the petitioner can influence them or abscond. Rival contentions raise debatable issues for trial and were not decided to avoid prejudice. Custody certificate showed about six months&#039; incarceration and no other cases against the petitioner. Further detention as an undertrial was unnecessary; release ordered on furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the CJM/Duty Magistrate and subject to imposed conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 715 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779919</link>
      <description>Petitioner arrested 12.4.2025 charged under Section 132 read with Section 69 of the CGST/State GST Act granted regular bail. Court observed pre-charge evidence is being recorded, witnesses are official, and there is no prima facie reason to believe the petitioner can influence them or abscond. Rival contentions raise debatable issues for trial and were not decided to avoid prejudice. Custody certificate showed about six months&#039; incarceration and no other cases against the petitioner. Further detention as an undertrial was unnecessary; release ordered on furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the CJM/Duty Magistrate and subject to imposed conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>