<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>DELHI HIGH COURT-HIGHLIGHTS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=58826</link>
    <description>The court exercised judicial discretion to permit interim travel in a cheque bounce prosecution, granted the prosecution a final procedural opportunity to contest bail in a money laundering matter while curbing repeated adjournments, held that constitutional petitions may be entertained against orders of the specialised tribunal under the Unlawful Activities framework, and considered a will construction challenge based on linguistic inconsistency in a disputed testamentary instrument.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 21:31:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 21:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>DELHI HIGH COURT-HIGHLIGHTS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=58826</link>
      <description>The court exercised judicial discretion to permit interim travel in a cheque bounce prosecution, granted the prosecution a final procedural opportunity to contest bail in a money laundering matter while curbing repeated adjournments, held that constitutional petitions may be entertained against orders of the specialised tribunal under the Unlawful Activities framework, and considered a will construction challenge based on linguistic inconsistency in a disputed testamentary instrument.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 21:31:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=58826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>