https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464257 CESTAT, Ahmedabad AT held that a Container Freight Station is not liable to have cost recovery charges confirmed by the Commissioner because there is no statutory mechanism empowering the Commissioner to recover such charges under Regulation 5(2) of the 2009 Regulations. Following precedent distinguishing earlier HC decisions and relying on a prior CESTAT ruling, the impugned order confirming cost recovery charges was set aside and the appeal allowed. en-us Mon, 22 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Oct 2025 20:00:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464257 CESTAT, Ahmedabad AT held that a Container Freight Station is not liable to have cost recovery charges confirmed by the Commissioner because there is no statutory mechanism empowering the Commissioner to recover such charges under Regulation 5(2) of the 2009 Regulations. Following precedent distinguishing earlier HC decisions and relying on a prior CESTAT ruling, the impugned order confirming cost recovery charges was set aside and the appeal allowed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 22 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464257