<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1907 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464254</link>
    <description>ITAT held that the notice issued under section 143(2) was not in the CBDT-prescribed format (only stated computer-aided scrutiny without specifying limited or complete/manual scrutiny), rendering the notice invalid; consequently the assessment framed under section 143(3) pursuant to that notice was void ab initio and quashed. The Tribunal relied on earlier coordinate decisions holding that non-compliance with the CBDT instruction invalidates the notice and all consequential proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 19:08:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1907 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464254</link>
      <description>ITAT held that the notice issued under section 143(2) was not in the CBDT-prescribed format (only stated computer-aided scrutiny without specifying limited or complete/manual scrutiny), rendering the notice invalid; consequently the assessment framed under section 143(3) pursuant to that notice was void ab initio and quashed. The Tribunal relied on earlier coordinate decisions holding that non-compliance with the CBDT instruction invalidates the notice and all consequential proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>