https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47313 The writ petition challenging an excise adjudication order was declined because an efficacious statutory appeal was available, so the High Court did not entertain the petition on the ground of alternate remedy. The petitioner was, however, granted liberty to pursue the appellate remedy on condition that 50% of the demand is deposited within the stipulated time. The document reflects the court's emphasis on exhaustion of statutory remedies before invoking writ jurisdiction, while preserving a conditional right to appeal. en-us Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:02:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47313 The writ petition challenging an excise adjudication order was declined because an efficacious statutory appeal was available, so the High Court did not entertain the petition on the ground of alternate remedy. The petitioner was, however, granted liberty to pursue the appellate remedy on condition that 50% of the demand is deposited within the stipulated time. The document reflects the court's emphasis on exhaustion of statutory remedies before invoking writ jurisdiction, while preserving a conditional right to appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47313