https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47312 The HC upheld the rejection of the petitioner's application for registration under Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, due to outstanding excise dues from the previous registrant and the existing registration of the premises. The Court affirmed the lawfulness of the order dated 19-2-2004, emphasizing compliance with registration procedures to prevent duty evasion. The petition was dismissed, reinforcing the necessity for adherence to specified conditions and the prevention of successive registrations for the same premises. en-us Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47312 The HC upheld the rejection of the petitioner's application for registration under Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, due to outstanding excise dues from the previous registrant and the existing registration of the premises. The Court affirmed the lawfulness of the order dated 19-2-2004, emphasizing compliance with registration procedures to prevent duty evasion. The petition was dismissed, reinforcing the necessity for adherence to specified conditions and the prevention of successive registrations for the same premises. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47312