<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dredger qualifies as input; Rule 2(a) and 2(k)(v)(c) read together allow CENVAT credit for the assessee</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93304</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order of the Commissioner and held that the dredger imported by the assessee does not fall within the restricted definition of &quot;capital goods&quot; under CCR Rule 2(a) such that the exclusion in Rule 2(k)(v)(c) would preclude its treatment as an &quot;input.&quot; The Tribunal construed the terms of Rules 2(a) and 2(k) contextually, applying the proviso &quot;unless the context otherwise requires,&quot; and concluded the expression &quot;capital goods&quot; in Rule 2(k) must be read consistently with Rule 2(a). Consequently the exclusion clause is inapplicable and the assessee is entitled to CENVAT credit in respect of the dredger.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dredger qualifies as input; Rule 2(a) and 2(k)(v)(c) read together allow CENVAT credit for the assessee</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93304</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order of the Commissioner and held that the dredger imported by the assessee does not fall within the restricted definition of &quot;capital goods&quot; under CCR Rule 2(a) such that the exclusion in Rule 2(k)(v)(c) would preclude its treatment as an &quot;input.&quot; The Tribunal construed the terms of Rules 2(a) and 2(k) contextually, applying the proviso &quot;unless the context otherwise requires,&quot; and concluded the expression &quot;capital goods&quot; in Rule 2(k) must be read consistently with Rule 2(a). Consequently the exclusion clause is inapplicable and the assessee is entitled to CENVAT credit in respect of the dredger.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>