<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 605 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779809</link>
    <description>HC allowed the revision, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order for AY 2008-09 and quashed the penalty and seizure. The court held that printers imported for use in a photographic lab, not for sale, could not be penalized merely because Form-38 was blank; blank forms alone do not establish intent to evade tax. The assessment record showed no adverse finding of sale or purchase of printers, so seizure and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 605 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779809</link>
      <description>HC allowed the revision, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order for AY 2008-09 and quashed the penalty and seizure. The court held that printers imported for use in a photographic lab, not for sale, could not be penalized merely because Form-38 was blank; blank forms alone do not establish intent to evade tax. The assessment record showed no adverse finding of sale or purchase of printers, so seizure and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>