https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47306 The High Court upheld the order of attachment passed by the Central Excise Officer, interpreting the Delhi High Court's previous judgment as implicitly including the award of interest. It emphasized that court orders should be understood practically rather than through strict statutory interpretation. The petitioner was directed to deposit the interest amount and arrears of duty within four weeks to lift the attachment on their property. Failure to comply would lead to the dismissal of the petition, preventing frustration of court orders and ensuring implementation of directives. en-us Tue, 02 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:46:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47306 The High Court upheld the order of attachment passed by the Central Excise Officer, interpreting the Delhi High Court's previous judgment as implicitly including the award of interest. It emphasized that court orders should be understood practically rather than through strict statutory interpretation. The petitioner was directed to deposit the interest amount and arrears of duty within four weeks to lift the attachment on their property. Failure to comply would lead to the dismissal of the petition, preventing frustration of court orders and ensuring implementation of directives. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 02 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47306