<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 622 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779826</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax paid on ocean freight under Notification No. 15/2017-ST was claimed on the basis that the levy had already been held ultra vires in earlier rulings. The HC treated those prior decisions as binding on the identical facts and found no independent ground to refuse refund. The petitioner was therefore entitled to refund of the tax already paid, subject only to verification of the relevant payment details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 622 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779826</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax paid on ocean freight under Notification No. 15/2017-ST was claimed on the basis that the levy had already been held ultra vires in earlier rulings. The HC treated those prior decisions as binding on the identical facts and found no independent ground to refuse refund. The petitioner was therefore entitled to refund of the tax already paid, subject only to verification of the relevant payment details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>