https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779827 In a PMLA bail matter, the Patna HC considered the statutory rigour of Section 45, the allegations of proceeds of crime and layering of funds, and the petitioner's prolonged custody against the risk of delayed trial. It held that continued incarceration could not be justified where near-term conclusion of trial appeared unlikely and release was necessary to protect the right to speedy trial under Article 21. Bail was therefore granted, subject to furnishing the directed bond, sureties and compliance with the imposed conditions. en-us Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779827 In a PMLA bail matter, the Patna HC considered the statutory rigour of Section 45, the allegations of proceeds of crime and layering of funds, and the petitioner's prolonged custody against the risk of delayed trial. It held that continued incarceration could not be justified where near-term conclusion of trial appeared unlikely and release was necessary to protect the right to speedy trial under Article 21. Bail was therefore granted, subject to furnishing the directed bond, sureties and compliance with the imposed conditions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779827