<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 626 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779830</link>
    <description>CESTAT MUMBAI - AT set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, holding that Social Welfare Surcharge (SWS) is computed on Basic Customs Duty (BCD) and where BCD is nil SWS is also nil. The tribunal followed the HC decision which relied on CBIC Circular clarifying SWS is zero when aggregate customs duties are zero. A Review Petition against that HC ruling was dismissed, rendering the position final and precluding further challenge to SWS liability in cases with nil BCD.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 626 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779830</link>
      <description>CESTAT MUMBAI - AT set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, holding that Social Welfare Surcharge (SWS) is computed on Basic Customs Duty (BCD) and where BCD is nil SWS is also nil. The tribunal followed the HC decision which relied on CBIC Circular clarifying SWS is zero when aggregate customs duties are zero. A Review Petition against that HC ruling was dismissed, rendering the position final and precluding further challenge to SWS liability in cases with nil BCD.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>