<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 633 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779837</link>
    <description>DGFT was directed to review the TRQ allocation framework for gold imports under the India-UAE CEPA for FY 2025-26 in light of the petitioners&#039; grievances. The Court noted concerns that the allocation criteria may have been too narrow if confined to applicants with substantial prior turnover, and that the process should also consider first-time applicants and entities without a large turnover history so the quota is used effectively. It further observed that, if accepted, additional conditions or criteria could be introduced to ensure a lawful and workable allocation. The fresh exercise was required to consider the petitioners&#039; complaints before further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:39:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 633 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779837</link>
      <description>DGFT was directed to review the TRQ allocation framework for gold imports under the India-UAE CEPA for FY 2025-26 in light of the petitioners&#039; grievances. The Court noted concerns that the allocation criteria may have been too narrow if confined to applicants with substantial prior turnover, and that the process should also consider first-time applicants and entities without a large turnover history so the quota is used effectively. It further observed that, if accepted, additional conditions or criteria could be introduced to ensure a lawful and workable allocation. The fresh exercise was required to consider the petitioners&#039; complaints before further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>